Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Analysis: AT&T keen on Europe, investors wary of merits

By Sinead Carew and Leila Abboud

NEW YORK/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - AT&T Inc has been exploring a possible bid for a European carrier such as Vodafone Group Plc, but faces resistance from some investors concerned about the continent's cut-throat competition and complex regulations.

AT&T Chief Executive Randall Stephenson has been talking up Europe, saying on Tuesday that he sees "a huge opportunity for somebody" to upgrade European networks and reap the kinds of profits from high-speed wireless services already seen in the United States.

Telecoms bankers familiar with the matter say the No. 2 U.S. wireless operator has been considering acquiring a pan-European carrier with possible targets including Vodafone, as well as Britain's largest mobile operator EE and Spain's Telefonica.

Not so fast, say some investors, citing fierce competition in markets like France, Britain and Italy, as well as unwieldy European regulation of wireless airwaves. Stephenson hopes for changes to telecom regulations that he says sharply stunted European broadband investments.

But rules vary widely between Europe's 28 member states, so if AT&T did bid for Vodafone or another major player, it may be betting on regulatory changes that may take years - if they happen at all, analysts said.

"Generally speaking I'm not comfortable at all with them doing anything in Europe," said Mike Wetherington, an analyst at Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss. The investment firm is AT&T's 14th biggest shareholder with 31.92 million AT&T shares, or 0.6 percent of the company, according to Reuters data.

"We have stayed away from a fair amount of the European telecom names because of a discomfort with, among other things, regulation and competition," he said.

AT&T is seeking new ways to expand as growth in its home market slows, and the U.S. government seems highly unlikely to approve big domestic mergers after turning down the company's bid for T-Mobile USA in 2011.

The question is how big a deal AT&T could swallow. To move the needle the company - which is expected to generate 2013 revenue of $128.7 billion - would need a very large acquisition target.

Vodafone - with 409 million customers in 30 countries - is seen as AT&T's likeliest target now that the British company is offloading its stake in Verizon Wireless to Verizon Communications Inc.

AT&T has declined to comment on any specific acquisition targets.

"Your choices are Vodafone, Vodafone and Vodafone. There's nobody else that passes that test of being both big enough and politically palatable enough," said MoffettNathanson analyst Craig Moffett. He said other big European telcos with operations in many countries all remain partly state-owned, so AT&T would have to negotiate with governments.

Analysts estimate Vodafone's market value, excluding Verizon Wireless, at $96.5 billion(60 billion pounds). With a premium, the price tag could be $102.5 billion to $118.17 billion, according to a Macquarie survey with 108 investor responses.

An acquisition of Vodafone could boost AT&T's earnings per share a little, said New Street analyst Jonathan Chaplin, but there were "serious challenges" to the idea that AT&T could increase revenue or market share in Europe through a network upgrade there.

"There is no evidence yet of this strategy succeeding in the European markets where it has been attempted," he said.

NOT ALL SKEPTICS

Still, skepticism about an AT&T-Vodafone deal is far from universal. Some investors say the U.S. company could snag an operator in Europe at what they see as bargain prices because European carriers are trading at historically low valuations, whereas U.S. carriers are relatively expensive.

"To buy a global footprint and buy in cheap, that's where you go," said Mario Gabelli, founder of Gamco Investors, which manages about $40 billion in assets including multiple investments in Europe. Gabelli Funds LLC owns 1.95 million AT&T shares, according to Reuters data.

AT&T's equity could partly fund a deal. Its stock trades at about 6.6 times expected 2015 earnings before interest tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), according to Moffett, who puts the average European telcos' trading multiple at 5.5.

In comparison, UBS analyst John Hodulik said in a September research note that Vodafone would trade at 4.7 times EBITDA estimates for 2015, after it has sold the Verizon Wireless stake. UBS bankers advised Vodafone in its Verizon deal.

Hodulik said AT&T could borrow as much as $72 billion to fund a Vodafone deal. But issuing new debt would hurt its credit rating, analysts at the major U.S. ratings agencies said.

At a recent conference Stephenson said keeping AT&T's credit rating intact was a priority but he also cited Verizon's record $49 billion bond sale as providing new possibilities.

Investors and bankers in the fixed income sector have said that they believe there could be strong investor appetite if AT&T were to issue a large bond to finance a deal.

Investment manager Louis Cimino at W.H. Reaves & Co, which manages 3.72 million AT&T shares, said his appetite for an AT&T acquisition in Europe would depend on the deal.

"At the correct price a lot of things could be interesting," said Cimino, who would also focus on earnings growth prospects and time needed to repay debt incurred for an acquisition.

He would also weigh these concerns against a "very, very difficult" competitive environment and any signs of changes in the regulation of telecommunications companies across Europe.

(Additional reporting by Kate Holton and Sophie Sassard in London and Danielle Robinson at IFR in New York; Editing by Richard Chang)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-t-keen-europe-investors-wary-merits-201110482--finance.html

university of texas UT Austin Lizzie Velasquez att libya iPhone 5 9-11

The government #shutdown is hitting some military families especially hard. Some...

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://www.facebook.com/myfoxdc/posts/10102143610798628

Pope John Paul II Galaxy S4 google reader carnival cruise Conclave tmz Sizzurp

New Target opens at old Cabrini Green site, creates 200 jobs

CHICAGO (FOX 32 News) -

There was a ceremonial ribbon-cutting Tuesday night to celebrate the opening of a new big box store near downtown Chicago. While many new retail outlets are popping up, this one is in a neighborhood notorious for 80 years for violence and murder.

What became the Chicago Housing Authority's Cabrini-Green development was, in the 1920s, filled with impoverished Italian immigrants; the site of so many murders that one intersection was "dubbed Death Corner." In the 1960s, African-Americans took over. The killing continued. Now, at Division and Racine, that's all in the past.

As he toured the new big box store that is opening on the former site of Cabrini-Green, 27th Ward Ald. Walter Burnett said he felt a flood of memories of growing up in that huge public housing development -- some good, but many memories were not.

"It makes me want to cry," Burnett says. "Because they were shooting outside, my mom threw us in the tub. ?Get down! Get Down!'"

Where hundreds were shot over the past century, Burnett joined other dignitaries at a ceremonial ribbon cutting. Outside the new retail outlet, commuters on bicycles glided by a firehouse that still bears bullet holes from the bad old days. The new store will employ about 200, and has so far hired 65 former residents of Cabrini-Green.

New apartments and town homes -- integrated racially and economically -- are gradually replacing the more than 3,000 crime-ridden public housing units that were torn down. Those who remember the old community marvel at what's emerging.

Still, a CHA spokeswoman told FOX 32 the agency has built only 434 of the 1,200 replacement units it promised. And there is no timetable for completing the rest. Former resident Valencia Williams was hired as a cashier at the new store, but now lives 11 miles away at 67th and Eberhardt, because she can't afford anything closer.

Source: http://www.myfoxchicago.com/story/23634700/target-opens-on-old-cabrini-green-site-creates-200-jobs

Hasnat Khan Olivia Nuzzi Cyclospora oj simpson Nick Jonas Eileen Brennan brian wilson

Florida led the nation in foreclosures completed in August

Even as Florida?s housing market is showing solid recovery with impressive gains in prices and sales volume, the state led the nation in foreclosures completed in the year ended in August; no other state was even close, according to CoreLogic.

Of the 658,463 foreclosures completed nationwide during the 12-month period, 111,000 of them, or nearly 17 percent, were in Florida, according to the Irvine, Calif.-based data firm.

Michigan ranked No. 2, with the completion of 60,000 foreclosures, and No. 3 California wrapped up 58,000 proceedings during the period.

The top five foreclosure states ? which included No. 4 Texas, with 43,000 foreclosures finalized, and No. 5 Georgia, where 40,000 were finished ? accounted for almost half of all foreclosures completed nationwide.

And although Florida cleaned out more foreclosures than any other state, it still has the highest inventory of foreclosures, Corelogic said. The firm said 7.9 percent of mortgaged homes in Florida were in some stage of foreclosure in August. New Jersey ranked second among the states, with 6.2 percent of all its mortgaged residences in foreclosure. New York had 4.9 percent; Maine, 4.0 percent; and Connecticut, 3.9 percent.

Florida also had the highest rate of seriously delinquent mortgages in August with 12.4 percent of its mortgages past due for 90 days or more. That was more than twice the national delinquency rate of 5.3 percent of loans, Corelogic said.

Source: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/10/08/3678162/florida-led-the-nation-in-foreclosures.html

spinal muscular atrophy brooklyn nets may day protests tony nominations 2012 facebook organ donor jessica simpson gives birth carrie underwood blown away

No News is Good News | oncirculation

Early news story on climate. From the August 30, 1884 edition of the New York Times.

Early news story on climate. From the August 30, 1884 edition of the New York Times.

By Evan

As with many people, I always had a ritual of sitting down to read or watch the news in the morning. This has been something I have done for the past 13 years, when I was in my first year of university (showing my age here). Whether newspapers, TV news programs, or news websites, I usually spent an average of one hour a day absorbing the events of the world.

One day back in August, I decided, no more. I think that the constant load of bad news had led me to have a negative viewpoint in life. Since that day, I have not read news websites or newspapers, and I no longer turn on the news while having breakfast in the morning, opting instead to listen to the great radio station, ABC Dig Music (seriously, it is one of the greatest music stations ever).

How have the past couple of months gone? Without the distraction of the news, I have had an extra hour of productive time. Instead of news, I can instead spend the time browsing through the latest Science or Nature, for instance. I am spending more time exercising (health of body, health of mind). During this time, I have not felt that I am missing out on anything important. If there is a major news event (i.e. the US government shutting down, or an Australian politician staying something really stupid), I have more than enough friends to inform me.

This has got me thinking, what has happened to the news and how it has been reported in the past decade? The advent of widely accessible Internet has put a lot of pressure on investigative journalism. Reports on major news stories happen so quickly that it is no longer possible for print media to be the predominant source of information in society. The proliferation of blogs and other forms of social media communication has also forced major media companies to pander to an audience that advertisers can justify paying for.

This has led to the transformation of news into ?newpinion? (a word I just made up now). News no longer represents some neutral account of events. Writers of news now have to pander to a wildly opinionated audience that either fully supports some extreme, or completely opposes it. At first, it was largely tabloids that were responsible for newpinion, but recently also become the focus of state media like the ABC. Maybe it has been going on longer than this, but I have just completely been blinded. Who knows. All I know is the last time I went back to Canada, and watched CBC News Network (formerly Newsworld), it basically was a 15 minute loop of the current top 3 or 4 stories, interrupted by opinion shows. I?m pretty sure it used to be better.

Of course, this is an earth science blog, and nothing has been front and center in the global news more than climate change. The IPCC Report was formally released this weekend, and with it a stronger stance that the observed global warming during the past century is largely caused by human activity. Yet, during the formation of the document, many of the biggest headlines have been trying hard to cast doubt on the conclusions of the report. Most of these articles are written in the form of ?newpinion?. For instance, I searched Google News for a random article on the IPCC, and came across this ABC News report. The headline reads ?IPCC faces criticism ahead of report?s release?. In this report, they interview a scientist who says ?yep, things are going the way the IPCC report says, but as with any big document, some mistakes crept in?, an descenting engineer who literally says ?science is actually about diversity of opinions and then testing those opinions? (really?), and a writer who says that the IPCC authors are being ?bitchy?. The real distraction in all of this is that there is no focus on the actual finding of the report, but rather that some people?s opinion of it. It is disappointing to read this piece, especially since few climate scientists would object to the rather cautious reporting of the IPCC. It goes far further than this. Here are some of the headlines I got off Google News with a simple search of ?IPCC?:

  • Climate change ?scientists? are just another pressure group
  • Hide: Climate panel leaves me cold
  • Top Scientists Confirm: Humans Suck
  • Let?s be honest ? the global warming debate isn?t about science
  • Global warming sceptics using media campaign to discredit IPCC
  • Not so global warming after all
  • Networks Embrace IPCC Report?s Fraudulent Warnings
  • The IPCC needs Obama?s team of spin masters to survive their latest report
  • Meteorologist Eric Holthaus? vow to never to fly again draws praise, criticism
  • Climate deniers in their own universe
  • Liberal media huddles to re-hype global warming
  • IPCC report makes US meteorologist cry ? and give up flying

And so on. Most of these headlines come from legitimate news organizations. When I look at how news is reported, I feel very comfortable with my decision to stop paying attention. Investigative journalism has now largely been supplanted by opinion, reformations of wire stories or pure fluff. This serves as a challenge to well intentioned scientists wanting to have a go at publicizing results. The great irony is that the best way to do this is likely to go the opinion route and get bloggers aboard. In all likelihood, it is impossible to convince those who would read something like ?Liberal media huddles to re-hype global warming?. Preaching to the choir? Yes, but what else can be done? The only other option is to ignore the news, with the realization that it may not really matter any more.

Like this:

Like Loading...

Source: http://oncirculation.com/2013/10/08/no-news-is-good-news/

Cnn Electoral Map dixville notch Remember Remember The 5th Of November guy fawkes gary johnson gary johnson where do i vote